The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
OK so the subject has an entry on FA and DE WP's but I'm not sure about the N criteria there but here on EN, apparently the subject clearly fails to meet relevant notability guidelines
WP:AUTHOR and even basic GNG. The subject has received some trivial mention in independent RS but I am unable to locate in-depth coverage about the subject, unfortunately. I suspect some of the cited sources are not even reliable enough. The subject has also received some insignificant non-notable awards.
Saqib (
talk) 07:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions) 21:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Szzuk (
talk) 12:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Passes
WP:NARTIST#4 with multiple significant awards and important exhibitions supported by reliable sources.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 18:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The awards and Exhibitions not significant in this case. --
Saqib(
talk) 06:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Totally agree with Saquib. There are actually only two or three minor exhibitions listed. Does not pass any aspect of
WP:NARTIST.
104.163.159.237 (
talk) 03:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 03:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - satisfies requirements of GNG.
EnPassant (
talk) 18:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC)reply
How? Care to provide some solid coverage which can help establish the WP:N? --
Saqib (
talk) 18:08, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
OK so the subject has an entry on FA and DE WP's but I'm not sure about the N criteria there but here on EN, apparently the subject clearly fails to meet relevant notability guidelines
WP:AUTHOR and even basic GNG. The subject has received some trivial mention in independent RS but I am unable to locate in-depth coverage about the subject, unfortunately. I suspect some of the cited sources are not even reliable enough. The subject has also received some insignificant non-notable awards.
Saqib (
talk) 07:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
78.26(
spin me /
revolutions) 21:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Szzuk (
talk) 12:01, 26 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep Passes
WP:NARTIST#4 with multiple significant awards and important exhibitions supported by reliable sources.
Eggishorn(talk)(contrib) 18:16, 4 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The awards and Exhibitions not significant in this case. --
Saqib(
talk) 06:59, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Delete. Totally agree with Saquib. There are actually only two or three minor exhibitions listed. Does not pass any aspect of
WP:NARTIST.
104.163.159.237 (
talk) 03:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
SpartazHumbug! 03:20, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Keep - satisfies requirements of GNG.
EnPassant (
talk) 18:46, 10 May 2018 (UTC)reply
How? Care to provide some solid coverage which can help establish the WP:N? --
Saqib (
talk) 18:08, 11 May 2018 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.