- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:56, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Sagar Dhakal (politician)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sagar Dhakal (politician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertorialized WP:BLP of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate in an election. As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates -- the notability bar for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while a candidate gets an article only if either (a) he can demonstrate that he already had preexisting notability for other reasons, or (b) he can show a credible reason why his candidacy should be treated as a special case of significantly greater notability than everybody else's candidacies. But this fails to demonstrate either of those things (it tries for the latter test but misses, because a candidate isn't more special for challenging Person X than they would be for challenging Person Y), and is "referenced" solely to his own campaign website. Bearcat ( talk) 16:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nepal. Bearcat ( talk) 16:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - badly written article. Any coverage is only brief and not significant. Doesn't meet NPOL or GNG. ProofRobust 17:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete one source is simply a "meet the candidates" article with a brief bio. Long way from GNG. I'm not sure what (Election symbol:syringe) is supposed to be. Oaktree b ( talk) 18:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete: Candidates of election are not notable. LordVoldemort728 ( talk) 15:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks notability. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 21:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SNOW. Consensus is fairly strong here per WP:POLOUTCOMES. Bearian ( talk) 15:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:56, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Sagar Dhakal (politician)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sagar Dhakal (politician) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertorialized WP:BLP of a person notable only as a non-winning candidate in an election. As always, candidates do not get Wikipedia articles just for being candidates -- the notability bar for politicians is holding a notable office, not just running for one, while a candidate gets an article only if either (a) he can demonstrate that he already had preexisting notability for other reasons, or (b) he can show a credible reason why his candidacy should be treated as a special case of significantly greater notability than everybody else's candidacies. But this fails to demonstrate either of those things (it tries for the latter test but misses, because a candidate isn't more special for challenging Person X than they would be for challenging Person Y), and is "referenced" solely to his own campaign website. Bearcat ( talk) 16:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Nepal. Bearcat ( talk) 16:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - badly written article. Any coverage is only brief and not significant. Doesn't meet NPOL or GNG. ProofRobust 17:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete one source is simply a "meet the candidates" article with a brief bio. Long way from GNG. I'm not sure what (Election symbol:syringe) is supposed to be. Oaktree b ( talk) 18:00, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Strong Delete: Candidates of election are not notable. LordVoldemort728 ( talk) 15:34, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks notability. -- Valjean ( talk) ( PING me) 21:22, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:SNOW. Consensus is fairly strong here per WP:POLOUTCOMES. Bearian ( talk) 15:35, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.