The result was delete. CitiCat ♫ 19:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The article lacks reliable, independent sources, and I was unable to find such sources with my googling. Prod removed by creator- no comment from creator on article, but he responded to my request for sources on his talk page by asking me to 'kindly butt off.' * FisherQueen ( Talk) 03:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The AfD discussion so far seems to have lost sight of the clear "notability" of Safia Aoude. She hosted the very popular Pan Am 103/Lockerbie crash website in the years leading up to the creation of Wikipedia ( [1]). On 1 September 2007, Aoude returned to the subject by creating the Pan Am 103 news/blogspot ( [2]). An archive of the now defunct Pan Am 103/Lockerbie crash website is hosted by the independent plane-truth website ( [3]). The article makes reference to Aoude's Lockerbie Trial website ( [4]), extracts personal information from Aoude's web site ( [5]) and uses the Critique of Safia Aoude by two independent journalists for much of the remainder ( [6]). The Safia Aoude article, as updated and amended, now fulfils Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Phase4 09:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply
According to Wikipedia:Verifiability the guideline says that any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a source. As the creator and main editor of the Safia Aoude article, I am content that http://www.sappho.dk/Den%20loebende/zyklonbenglish.html, which has been accepted above by FisherQueen as independent, is the required reliable source for any material that is likely to be challenged. Phase4 16:45, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The conclusion of this AfD debate now requires the deletionists to admit their errors, to eat humble pie and to do the decent thing and change their untenable position. Phase4 21:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. CitiCat ♫ 19:25, 9 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The article lacks reliable, independent sources, and I was unable to find such sources with my googling. Prod removed by creator- no comment from creator on article, but he responded to my request for sources on his talk page by asking me to 'kindly butt off.' * FisherQueen ( Talk) 03:20, 3 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The AfD discussion so far seems to have lost sight of the clear "notability" of Safia Aoude. She hosted the very popular Pan Am 103/Lockerbie crash website in the years leading up to the creation of Wikipedia ( [1]). On 1 September 2007, Aoude returned to the subject by creating the Pan Am 103 news/blogspot ( [2]). An archive of the now defunct Pan Am 103/Lockerbie crash website is hosted by the independent plane-truth website ( [3]). The article makes reference to Aoude's Lockerbie Trial website ( [4]), extracts personal information from Aoude's web site ( [5]) and uses the Critique of Safia Aoude by two independent journalists for much of the remainder ( [6]). The Safia Aoude article, as updated and amended, now fulfils Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Phase4 09:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply
According to Wikipedia:Verifiability the guideline says that any material that is challenged or likely to be challenged needs a source. As the creator and main editor of the Safia Aoude article, I am content that http://www.sappho.dk/Den%20loebende/zyklonbenglish.html, which has been accepted above by FisherQueen as independent, is the required reliable source for any material that is likely to be challenged. Phase4 16:45, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply
The conclusion of this AfD debate now requires the deletionists to admit their errors, to eat humble pie and to do the decent thing and change their untenable position. Phase4 21:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC) reply