The result was keep. Needs work but I'll believe the arguments that the notability is here. Tone 22:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable. The only verifiable source is one interview in a magazine of doubtful significance. A PROD was contested with the edit summary "contest prod - subject appears to be a notable actress (see http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Sadia+Imam%22&cf=all for example) - flag article issues, will properly source ASAP". However, the google link given provides all of 11 hits, most of which make only incidental passing mentions of Sadia Imam, and none of them constitutes substantial coverage. The editor who contested the PROD never came back to "properly source", and my attempts to do so have failed to turn up anything suitable. JamesBWatson ( talk) 10:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Needs work but I'll believe the arguments that the notability is here. Tone 22:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC) reply
Not notable. The only verifiable source is one interview in a magazine of doubtful significance. A PROD was contested with the edit summary "contest prod - subject appears to be a notable actress (see http://news.google.com/archivesearch?um=1&ned=us&hl=en&q=%22Sadia+Imam%22&cf=all for example) - flag article issues, will properly source ASAP". However, the google link given provides all of 11 hits, most of which make only incidental passing mentions of Sadia Imam, and none of them constitutes substantial coverage. The editor who contested the PROD never came back to "properly source", and my attempts to do so have failed to turn up anything suitable. JamesBWatson ( talk) 10:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC) reply