- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sacol ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Single source used ( [1]), does not appear to be notable because of this. Unless more secondary sources are presented, this should be nuked and redirected to List of islands of Zamboanga City. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 00:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Philippines, and Islands. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 00:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, meets
WP:GEONATURAL as a named populated island that is home to multiple
barangays (i.e.
information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist
) — siro χ o 09:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC) - Keep as a populated island with historic and modern importance in the area. Note that there are also some news articles about its association with local terrorist and bandit groups fleeing away from the law but I think those are just isolated cases. -- Lenticel ( talk) 02:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Inhabited islands are clearly notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 00:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sacol ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Single source used ( [1]), does not appear to be notable because of this. Unless more secondary sources are presented, this should be nuked and redirected to List of islands of Zamboanga City. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 00:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Philippines, and Islands. JWilz12345 ( Talk| Contrib's.) 00:48, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, meets
WP:GEONATURAL as a named populated island that is home to multiple
barangays (i.e.
information beyond statistics and coordinates is known to exist
) — siro χ o 09:13, 4 November 2023 (UTC) - Keep as a populated island with historic and modern importance in the area. Note that there are also some news articles about its association with local terrorist and bandit groups fleeing away from the law but I think those are just isolated cases. -- Lenticel ( talk) 02:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per above. Inhabited islands are clearly notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 11:12, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.