The result was delete. The clear opinion here is that there are insufficient reliable sources to show notability. The argument that blogs can show notability for software may have merit, but this is not the place to determine that. Kevin ( talk) 05:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC) reply
This non-notable, uncited article has had various tags placed on it for two years. PROD was removed by an IP address without addressing the issues. The software has minor mentions in publications from books.google, and scholar.google.com, but they mention the software being used, not articles directly significant discussion about the software. This article functions as promotion for the software. Wikipedia is not a software directory, proof of existence is not notable. Miami33139 ( talk) 16:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Are you serious!!!!! do you really want to delete this page!! Why don't you delete the whole wikipedia then go and have a chilled beer!!
FFmpeg official website has listed SUPER as part of the FFmpeg-Based Projects: http://ffmpeg.org/projects.html
MEncoder official website has listed SUPER as related projects under Windows: http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/projects.html
Microsoft official website identifies SUPER as Vista compatible: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-vista/Search.aspx?type=Software&s=SUPER%20erightsoft
SUPER(C) is available for download from various sites:
Here's a bunch of similar candidates for AfD
They are loaded with single-purpose IP addresses during editing same case as for SUPER,
I think they all deserve to be eliminated, exterminated.
I started using Super since the earlier versions in 2005, the product is pretty much straight forward and easy to use yet extremely handy to encode multimedia files from one format to another. Searching erightsoft in Google or YouTube leads to hundreds of hits, Super by erightsoft won the third position in CHIP German Magazine on March 2009, please keep it! http://www.chip.de/artikel/Vergleichstest-Alleskonvertierer-8_35478393.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasay rewelra babe ( talk • contribs) 10:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The clear opinion here is that there are insufficient reliable sources to show notability. The argument that blogs can show notability for software may have merit, but this is not the place to determine that. Kevin ( talk) 05:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC) reply
This non-notable, uncited article has had various tags placed on it for two years. PROD was removed by an IP address without addressing the issues. The software has minor mentions in publications from books.google, and scholar.google.com, but they mention the software being used, not articles directly significant discussion about the software. This article functions as promotion for the software. Wikipedia is not a software directory, proof of existence is not notable. Miami33139 ( talk) 16:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC) reply
Are you serious!!!!! do you really want to delete this page!! Why don't you delete the whole wikipedia then go and have a chilled beer!!
FFmpeg official website has listed SUPER as part of the FFmpeg-Based Projects: http://ffmpeg.org/projects.html
MEncoder official website has listed SUPER as related projects under Windows: http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/projects.html
Microsoft official website identifies SUPER as Vista compatible: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/compatibility/windows-vista/Search.aspx?type=Software&s=SUPER%20erightsoft
SUPER(C) is available for download from various sites:
Here's a bunch of similar candidates for AfD
They are loaded with single-purpose IP addresses during editing same case as for SUPER,
I think they all deserve to be eliminated, exterminated.
I started using Super since the earlier versions in 2005, the product is pretty much straight forward and easy to use yet extremely handy to encode multimedia files from one format to another. Searching erightsoft in Google or YouTube leads to hundreds of hits, Super by erightsoft won the third position in CHIP German Magazine on March 2009, please keep it! http://www.chip.de/artikel/Vergleichstest-Alleskonvertierer-8_35478393.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rasay rewelra babe ( talk • contribs) 10:18, 6 November 2009 (UTC) reply