The result was redirect to
Liberty Holdings Limited.
Spartaz
Humbug! 17:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC) no consensus.
2001:448A:6000:FD1B:CDB2:749D:A344:C24D (
talk)
04:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article has only 1st party sources; I can find nothing but listings in Google, DGG ( talk ) 07:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
“Stanlib iol” gives us numerous results including: from 2021 [1]. From 2009 [2]. From 2018 [3]. From 2004 [4]. From 2015 (Bloomberg) [5]. 2006: [6]. 2004: [7]. 2012: [8]. Here’s coverage from News24: [9]. I’m on a mobile, but there are literally dozens of articles in WP:RS demonstrating its notability. Park3r ( talk) 22:20, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we merge content that is not properly sourced?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
14:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment I feel like WP:NOTCLEANUP is being disregarded here. The subject of the article is notable, regardless of the sourcing. I have added numerous citations above from WP:RS demonstrating notability. Once notability is demonstrated, the AFD process should end and other mechanisms used to address sourcing and other issues with the article. Also WP:WORLDWIDE needs to be borne in mind. Park3r ( talk) 07:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
21:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
The result was redirect to
Liberty Holdings Limited.
Spartaz
Humbug! 17:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC) no consensus.
2001:448A:6000:FD1B:CDB2:749D:A344:C24D (
talk)
04:06, 11 July 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Article has only 1st party sources; I can find nothing but listings in Google, DGG ( talk ) 07:31, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
“Stanlib iol” gives us numerous results including: from 2021 [1]. From 2009 [2]. From 2018 [3]. From 2004 [4]. From 2015 (Bloomberg) [5]. 2006: [6]. 2004: [7]. 2012: [8]. Here’s coverage from News24: [9]. I’m on a mobile, but there are literally dozens of articles in WP:RS demonstrating its notability. Park3r ( talk) 22:20, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Can we merge content that is not properly sourced?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
14:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Comment I feel like WP:NOTCLEANUP is being disregarded here. The subject of the article is notable, regardless of the sourcing. I have added numerous citations above from WP:RS demonstrating notability. Once notability is demonstrated, the AFD process should end and other mechanisms used to address sourcing and other issues with the article. Also WP:WORLDWIDE needs to be borne in mind. Park3r ( talk) 07:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Sandstein
21:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)