The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There is consensus to not keep. But there's no consensus abot whether to redirect, or where to. That remains up to editors. Sandstein 07:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
CoronaEditor, Being "famous" as per google hits or any such metric doesn't grant
notability; having multiple reliable sources significantly describing the subject, which allows writing a proper article on the person, is what makes a person notable, as per
WP:GNG. Among those google hits do you find any reliable sources that could be used to write an article on her?
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 03:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Forbes only has short blurb on her, which I don't think really counts as
significant coverage, and medium is a blogging website and so that source isn't reliable per
WP:BLOG.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 04:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Hollywood Reporter, which has been in existence since 1930 (90 years ago), is a respected media source. -
CoronaEditor (
talk) 06:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
2020 Kids' Choice Awards, coverage either consists of trivial mentions lasting a sentence or so, or coverage coming from unreliable sources, or coverage that is clearly marked as promotional. She therefore fails GNG, but she is mentioned at the target page.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 08:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Its probably best to gravitate towards the most recent one in a situation like this where there is no clear primary target.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 12:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect per ATD-R, as Devonian Wombat suggests: there is a dearth of independent coverage in reliable sources sufficient to pass the WP:BASIC requirements.
SERIAL# 10:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Closing admin, please note there are two more academic links and one more media link since article nomination. -
CoronaEditor (
talk) 00:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment As per
WP:APPNOTE, I have informed the article creators about the ongoing AfD. Thank you. -
CoronaEditor (
talk) 01:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The article creator was
User:Keke Zoë and they were already informed of the nomination by Galobtter. Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b} 02:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - Though I don't think it makes sense to redirect it to Kid's Choice Awards as
Galobtter and
Devonian suggested. That article only mentions her name once and does not contain any useful biographical information about her.
Michepman (
talk) 04:11 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete. A case of a gallant attempt at fame, initiated by an editor with a declared interest in putting up in Wikipedia articles about "YouTubers, influencers," etc. However, there are no adequate sources, either in number or in quality, to support the case for our subject's
notaibility.
Google hits and
YouTube views are unimportant in the context of sourcing. -
The Gnome (
talk) 22:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There is consensus to not keep. But there's no consensus abot whether to redirect, or where to. That remains up to editors. Sandstein 07:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)reply
CoronaEditor, Being "famous" as per google hits or any such metric doesn't grant
notability; having multiple reliable sources significantly describing the subject, which allows writing a proper article on the person, is what makes a person notable, as per
WP:GNG. Among those google hits do you find any reliable sources that could be used to write an article on her?
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 03:47, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Forbes only has short blurb on her, which I don't think really counts as
significant coverage, and medium is a blogging website and so that source isn't reliable per
WP:BLOG.
Galobtter (
pingó mió) 04:57, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Hollywood Reporter, which has been in existence since 1930 (90 years ago), is a respected media source. -
CoronaEditor (
talk) 06:29, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect to
2020 Kids' Choice Awards, coverage either consists of trivial mentions lasting a sentence or so, or coverage coming from unreliable sources, or coverage that is clearly marked as promotional. She therefore fails GNG, but she is mentioned at the target page.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 08:25, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Its probably best to gravitate towards the most recent one in a situation like this where there is no clear primary target.
Devonian Wombat (
talk) 12:31, 5 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Redirect per ATD-R, as Devonian Wombat suggests: there is a dearth of independent coverage in reliable sources sufficient to pass the WP:BASIC requirements.
SERIAL# 10:16, 4 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment Closing admin, please note there are two more academic links and one more media link since article nomination. -
CoronaEditor (
talk) 00:59, 8 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Comment As per
WP:APPNOTE, I have informed the article creators about the ongoing AfD. Thank you. -
CoronaEditor (
talk) 01:58, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The article creator was
User:Keke Zoë and they were already informed of the nomination by Galobtter. Headbomb {
t ·
c ·
p ·
b} 02:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
Delete - Though I don't think it makes sense to redirect it to Kid's Choice Awards as
Galobtter and
Devonian suggested. That article only mentions her name once and does not contain any useful biographical information about her.
Michepman (
talk) 04:11 9 May 2020 (UTC)
Delete. A case of a gallant attempt at fame, initiated by an editor with a declared interest in putting up in Wikipedia articles about "YouTubers, influencers," etc. However, there are no adequate sources, either in number or in quality, to support the case for our subject's
notaibility.
Google hits and
YouTube views are unimportant in the context of sourcing. -
The Gnome (
talk) 22:43, 9 May 2020 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.