- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep Nomination withdrawn by nominator. ( non-admin closure). Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 10:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- SMK Bukit Bandaraya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This should be notable as a secondary school (see
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES). However, I couldn't find the sources to confirm it meets
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG, which secondary schools still need. Its Malaysian WP article has no other sources, I added what I could. This really needs to be properly resolved - the article has been tagged for notability for 9 years, during which it has been prodded (which was removed with a suggestion AfD was more appropriate given this is a secondary school) and redirected to a list article. Hopefully we can establish whether this is notable or not.
Boleyn (
talk) 07:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as confirmed existence in this, this and this, I also found a few others but they were not easy to link; likely others if I dig deeper but these are enough. Boleyn Would you consider closing now that sources are given? SwisterTwister talk 06:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Withdraw nomination per SwisterTwister's excellent work, which I have incorporated into the article. Boleyn ( talk) 07:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep Nomination withdrawn by nominator. ( non-admin closure). Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 10:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- SMK Bukit Bandaraya ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This should be notable as a secondary school (see
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES). However, I couldn't find the sources to confirm it meets
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG, which secondary schools still need. Its Malaysian WP article has no other sources, I added what I could. This really needs to be properly resolved - the article has been tagged for notability for 9 years, during which it has been prodded (which was removed with a suggestion AfD was more appropriate given this is a secondary school) and redirected to a list article. Hopefully we can establish whether this is notable or not.
Boleyn (
talk) 07:47, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 10:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep as confirmed existence in this, this and this, I also found a few others but they were not easy to link; likely others if I dig deeper but these are enough. Boleyn Would you consider closing now that sources are given? SwisterTwister talk 06:41, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
Withdraw nomination per SwisterTwister's excellent work, which I have incorporated into the article. Boleyn ( talk) 07:21, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.