- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per WP:FOOTYN. If somebody from WikiProject Football could take this on and find good sources so as to help get it out of the Wikify backlog (I can't find any good info), it would be excellent! ( non-admin closure) d ross ( c · @) 18:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
S.C. Alba
- S.C. Alba ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Quite simply, the team does not appear to meet WP:N, and has a whole plethora of writing issues. A quick Google search grants no valuable information about the team, and the information provided on the page is primarily copied statistics. Vítor previously WP:PROD the page, which was promptly reverted by admin Fenix down. I think that's indicative this article requires a discussion. d ross ( c · @) 18:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The club has played in the Portuguese Cup at least once, so passes WP:FOOTYN. Nzd (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nzd (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The club has played in the Portuguese Cup 56 times so is clearly noteworthy [1], so passes WP:FOOTYN. League Octopus 20:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page continues to have serious issues, but those can be solved and the team meets WP:FOOTYN.-- Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 21:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 22:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 22:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh ( talk) 12:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:FOOTYN 56 times over, as mentioned above. AFD is not cleanup. Smartyllama ( talk) 16:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep per WP:FOOTYN. If somebody from WikiProject Football could take this on and find good sources so as to help get it out of the Wikify backlog (I can't find any good info), it would be excellent! ( non-admin closure) d ross ( c · @) 18:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
S.C. Alba
- S.C. Alba ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Quite simply, the team does not appear to meet WP:N, and has a whole plethora of writing issues. A quick Google search grants no valuable information about the team, and the information provided on the page is primarily copied statistics. Vítor previously WP:PROD the page, which was promptly reverted by admin Fenix down. I think that's indicative this article requires a discussion. d ross ( c · @) 18:04, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The club has played in the Portuguese Cup at least once, so passes WP:FOOTYN. Nzd (talk) 18:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nzd (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The club has played in the Portuguese Cup 56 times so is clearly noteworthy [1], so passes WP:FOOTYN. League Octopus 20:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page continues to have serious issues, but those can be solved and the team meets WP:FOOTYN.-- Crystallizedcarbon ( talk) 21:19, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 22:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh ( talk) 22:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Hhkohh ( talk) 12:42, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:FOOTYN 56 times over, as mentioned above. AFD is not cleanup. Smartyllama ( talk) 16:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.