The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:42, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Ryan Obermeyer

Ryan Obermeyer (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. Reads like a puff piece. Fails WP:GNG   Velella   ^{Velella Talk}   22:50, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:22, 24 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:22, 24 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(T) 20:23, 24 October 2017 (UTC) reply

• Delete I found, and aded, one semi-reliale source. Other than that, there do not seem to be extant sources to support even WP:GNG. 96.127.242.251 ( talk) 04:46, 25 October 2017 (UTC) reply
• Delete - lack of significant coverage. PhilKnight ( talk) 01:01, 30 October 2017 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.