The result was keep. There is a rough consensus that the article meets the notability guideline and with the argument that the article falls under BLP1E having been answered by some of those arguing to keep leaving no overriding policy reason for deletion, I am closing as keep. Davewild ( talk) 16:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 January 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
Possibly fails notability because all or most of the references are dubious, either not mentioning the subject at all, or do not meet WP:RS. I'm not even sure if this is about a real person or a character in a movie of TV show. Kudpung ( talk) 11:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. There is a rough consensus that the article meets the notability guideline and with the argument that the article falls under BLP1E having been answered by some of those arguing to keep leaving no overriding policy reason for deletion, I am closing as keep. Davewild ( talk) 16:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2011 January 15. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
Possibly fails notability because all or most of the references are dubious, either not mentioning the subject at all, or do not meet WP:RS. I'm not even sure if this is about a real person or a character in a movie of TV show. Kudpung ( talk) 11:49, 9 January 2011 (UTC) reply