The result was no consensus to delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The article is in breach of WP:POVFORK, because it discusses one aspect of Estonia-Russia relations without providing any context or contrasting views. It is also in breach of WP:SYNTH: the article puts different events under the title "Russian influence operations in Estonia," although there is no evidence that the events are part of any such "influence operations." Third, I'd like to point out that there are no similar articles in Wikipedia; there is no American influence operations in Europe or American influence operations in (name your country). Speculating whether this or that event is actually part of "influence operations" by another country is a popular subject in political journals. However, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a journal. It should not have articles about pure political speculation. Offliner ( talk) 14:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was no consensus to delete. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The article is in breach of WP:POVFORK, because it discusses one aspect of Estonia-Russia relations without providing any context or contrasting views. It is also in breach of WP:SYNTH: the article puts different events under the title "Russian influence operations in Estonia," although there is no evidence that the events are part of any such "influence operations." Third, I'd like to point out that there are no similar articles in Wikipedia; there is no American influence operations in Europe or American influence operations in (name your country). Speculating whether this or that event is actually part of "influence operations" by another country is a popular subject in political journals. However, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a journal. It should not have articles about pure political speculation. Offliner ( talk) 14:16, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply