The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Many binary international relations are notable, but this is a mere notice of the establishment of relations between an micro-nation and a major country with whom it has no substantial connection. Neither has a resident ambassador or even consulate with the other, DGG (
talk )
08:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Agree with deletion. To keep the article it would need things like: substantial trade relationship, important migratory movements from one country to the other, wars, political clashes that influenced substantially their relationship, etc.
Another problem. San Marino exists since 300, and has official existence since 1600. And it didn't any relationship with Russia until 1993?? It looks like Russia and San Marino never had any meaningful interaction. Too far away from each other, and San Marino was too small. --
Enric Naval (
talk)
12:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - nothing notable about this bilateral relationship, certainly nothing to suggest this relationships has received coverage in enough reliable sources to pass
WP:GNG. St★lwart11103:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Many binary international relations are notable, but this is a mere notice of the establishment of relations between an micro-nation and a major country with whom it has no substantial connection. Neither has a resident ambassador or even consulate with the other, DGG (
talk )
08:01, 13 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Agree with deletion. To keep the article it would need things like: substantial trade relationship, important migratory movements from one country to the other, wars, political clashes that influenced substantially their relationship, etc.
Another problem. San Marino exists since 300, and has official existence since 1600. And it didn't any relationship with Russia until 1993?? It looks like Russia and San Marino never had any meaningful interaction. Too far away from each other, and San Marino was too small. --
Enric Naval (
talk)
12:53, 13 December 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - nothing notable about this bilateral relationship, certainly nothing to suggest this relationships has received coverage in enough reliable sources to pass
WP:GNG. St★lwart11103:23, 17 December 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.