The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)reply
seems to fail
WP:GNG, also can't find any secondary sources for this
Prisencolin (
talk) 03:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: In the Dutch Wikipedia this is just a redirect to the (reference-free)
Vrumona article, where this brand gets a passing mention. Neither there nor in searches am I seeing anything amounting to substantial coverage that would amount to
notability.
AllyD (
talk) 07:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The quality of Dutch Wikipedia articles should not matter in the deletion process here. – Editør (
talk) 07:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - this is one of the biggest selling mixer brands in Holland (exact figures are hard to source online but the few I've found indicate a third-place overall market share in the Netherlands soft drinks sector?), and a staple product of any online shop selling Dutch goods. There aren't many good-quality secondary sources but the brand is featured quite a bit on Dutch food and drink blogs
[1]. Not sure if anyone can find better sources to verify, but this is a big Dutch brand and definitely notable. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 14:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best for now as I have found no particularly better sources and this is likely going to have archived and non-English sources, so Draft or restore if needed later, but there's nothing suggesting of obvious improvements at this time.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 23:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is indeed a well-known brand, and I spent a few minutes finding and adding a few sources. The brand has been around for decades, and the lack of sourcing is a bit dismaying. Still, I think I found enough to at least indicate that this is a notable brand. I still remember the slogans from the radio ads, for instance.
The Banner, do you have anything for us?
Drmies (
talk) 03:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Well known brand, I have added an incident with reliable third party source. The Bannertalk 10:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Mix met Royal Club, geen gewone club!
Drmies (
talk) 16:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
A few points: [1.] Notability, verifiability, etc, are not an issue here so deleting should be off the table. [2.] It would have been better if the parent Vrumona had an en.wiki article before Royal Club, or if, at the very least, Vrumona and Royal Club would be mentioned in the Heineken articles. [3] I looked into renaming Royal Club into Vrumona but the information here really is about the Royal Club brand. Bottomline: it is what it is and it is notable so keep.
gidonb (
talk) 03:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep.
MelanieN (
talk) 23:51, 10 June 2016 (UTC)reply
seems to fail
WP:GNG, also can't find any secondary sources for this
Prisencolin (
talk) 03:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete: In the Dutch Wikipedia this is just a redirect to the (reference-free)
Vrumona article, where this brand gets a passing mention. Neither there nor in searches am I seeing anything amounting to substantial coverage that would amount to
notability.
AllyD (
talk) 07:33, 17 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The quality of Dutch Wikipedia articles should not matter in the deletion process here. – Editør (
talk) 07:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep - this is one of the biggest selling mixer brands in Holland (exact figures are hard to source online but the few I've found indicate a third-place overall market share in the Netherlands soft drinks sector?), and a staple product of any online shop selling Dutch goods. There aren't many good-quality secondary sources but the brand is featured quite a bit on Dutch food and drink blogs
[1]. Not sure if anyone can find better sources to verify, but this is a big Dutch brand and definitely notable. ✤ Fosse 8 ✤ 14:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best for now as I have found no particularly better sources and this is likely going to have archived and non-English sources, so Draft or restore if needed later, but there's nothing suggesting of obvious improvements at this time.
SwisterTwistertalk 21:34, 1 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 23:17, 1 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. This is indeed a well-known brand, and I spent a few minutes finding and adding a few sources. The brand has been around for decades, and the lack of sourcing is a bit dismaying. Still, I think I found enough to at least indicate that this is a notable brand. I still remember the slogans from the radio ads, for instance.
The Banner, do you have anything for us?
Drmies (
talk) 03:05, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Well known brand, I have added an incident with reliable third party source. The Bannertalk 10:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
Mix met Royal Club, geen gewone club!
Drmies (
talk) 16:45, 2 June 2016 (UTC)reply
A few points: [1.] Notability, verifiability, etc, are not an issue here so deleting should be off the table. [2.] It would have been better if the parent Vrumona had an en.wiki article before Royal Club, or if, at the very least, Vrumona and Royal Club would be mentioned in the Heineken articles. [3] I looked into renaming Royal Club into Vrumona but the information here really is about the Royal Club brand. Bottomline: it is what it is and it is notable so keep.
gidonb (
talk) 03:52, 5 June 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.