The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
fails
WP:ORG there isn't a depth of coverage in secondary sources to support notability. Apart from awards based on MBA user surveys there is little written about the school and two sources remain self-published.
Cult of Green (
talk)
03:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment In the US, many business schools are for-profit corporations that offer a fast-track to a poorly recognized degree. They are often poorly accredited (national accreditation vs. regional) as well. This is clearly NOT such a school, and I want to make sure my American friends realize that before deciding their !vote.
Dcs002 (
talk)
02:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment' the issue is whether the subject meets the standard for notability' that is described at
WP:ORG. Specifically there are notes on schools at
WP:NSCHOOL which say that the subject must meet
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG or both. I don't see that the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Cult of Green (
talk)
02:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - The question here is whether this is a department of Dalhouse University, in which case consensus is that these are generally merged away or deleted; or whether it is an independent business school, in which case the piece should be kept according to the same thinking by which we automatically keep high schools. I'm unclear on the matter myself, but suspect that Merger is the correct play.
Carrite (
talk)
16:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Merge for now Our policy for these Schools varies-- we sometimes do make separate articles for first order divisions of a university like this. We almost always do for medical and law schools, and we do for the more famous business schools. I am not at the moment convinced this in in the class, and it do not really have enough material for a separate article. DGG (
talk )
16:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
fails
WP:ORG there isn't a depth of coverage in secondary sources to support notability. Apart from awards based on MBA user surveys there is little written about the school and two sources remain self-published.
Cult of Green (
talk)
03:25, 18 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment In the US, many business schools are for-profit corporations that offer a fast-track to a poorly recognized degree. They are often poorly accredited (national accreditation vs. regional) as well. This is clearly NOT such a school, and I want to make sure my American friends realize that before deciding their !vote.
Dcs002 (
talk)
02:58, 20 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment' the issue is whether the subject meets the standard for notability' that is described at
WP:ORG. Specifically there are notes on schools at
WP:NSCHOOL which say that the subject must meet
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG or both. I don't see that the topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
Cult of Green (
talk)
02:29, 21 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Comment - The question here is whether this is a department of Dalhouse University, in which case consensus is that these are generally merged away or deleted; or whether it is an independent business school, in which case the piece should be kept according to the same thinking by which we automatically keep high schools. I'm unclear on the matter myself, but suspect that Merger is the correct play.
Carrite (
talk)
16:06, 25 August 2014 (UTC)reply
Merge for now Our policy for these Schools varies-- we sometimes do make separate articles for first order divisions of a university like this. We almost always do for medical and law schools, and we do for the more famous business schools. I am not at the moment convinced this in in the class, and it do not really have enough material for a separate article. DGG (
talk )
16:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.