- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 18:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Rooted in Ireland
- Rooted in Ireland ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I could not establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. It has been tagged for notability for over 6 years, unresolved. Time it was fully discussed. Boleyn ( talk) 17:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy keepDeletion spree. Nomination seeks to bind AfD volunteers into working on articles of the nominator's choice. Unscintillating ( talk) 20:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unscintillating, you have made exactly this same comment at ten AfDs in a row, but it is not helpful to the discussion. You offered no reason for a Keep, much less a Speedy Keep, except to question the good faith of the nominator. If you have a valid reason for keeping this article, please give it. --
MelanieN (
talk) 14:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- @ MelanieN: If you are accusing me of commenting on other users, your comment is subject to refactoring, being moved to your talk page, or being removed. Please clarify if this is what you are doing. Unscintillating ( talk) 23:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unscintillating, you have made exactly this same comment at ten AfDs in a row, but it is not helpful to the discussion. You offered no reason for a Keep, much less a Speedy Keep, except to question the good faith of the nominator. If you have a valid reason for keeping this article, please give it. --
MelanieN (
talk) 14:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. PatrickGuinness ( talk) 14:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:GNG, I have failed to find significant independent reliable sources.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Randykitty ( talk) 18:10, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Rooted in Ireland
- Rooted in Ireland ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I could not establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. It has been tagged for notability for over 6 years, unresolved. Time it was fully discussed. Boleyn ( talk) 17:48, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
Speedy keepDeletion spree. Nomination seeks to bind AfD volunteers into working on articles of the nominator's choice. Unscintillating ( talk) 20:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unscintillating, you have made exactly this same comment at ten AfDs in a row, but it is not helpful to the discussion. You offered no reason for a Keep, much less a Speedy Keep, except to question the good faith of the nominator. If you have a valid reason for keeping this article, please give it. --
MelanieN (
talk) 14:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- @ MelanieN: If you are accusing me of commenting on other users, your comment is subject to refactoring, being moved to your talk page, or being removed. Please clarify if this is what you are doing. Unscintillating ( talk) 23:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- Unscintillating, you have made exactly this same comment at ten AfDs in a row, but it is not helpful to the discussion. You offered no reason for a Keep, much less a Speedy Keep, except to question the good faith of the nominator. If you have a valid reason for keeping this article, please give it. --
MelanieN (
talk) 14:54, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 12:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. PatrickGuinness ( talk) 14:01, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey2010 • (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: fails WP:GNG, I have failed to find significant independent reliable sources.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.