From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 03:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Ron Kolm (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:AUTHOR . No notable publications. No major awards LibStar ( talk) 17:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Covered in sources such as Suburban Ambush: Downtown Writing and the Fiction of Insurgency, Concise Companion to Postwar American Literature and Culture and Up is Up, But So is Down: New York's Downtown Literary Scene, 1974-1992. Andrew D. ( talk) 19:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply
is this indepth coverage? LibStar ( talk) 22:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 05:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 03:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC) reply

Ron Kolm (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:AUTHOR . No notable publications. No major awards LibStar ( talk) 17:00, 8 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:49, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 19:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 10:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Covered in sources such as Suburban Ambush: Downtown Writing and the Fiction of Insurgency, Concise Companion to Postwar American Literature and Culture and Up is Up, But So is Down: New York's Downtown Literary Scene, 1974-1992. Andrew D. ( talk) 19:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply
is this indepth coverage? LibStar ( talk) 22:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 05:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook