![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 December 20. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. ( X! · talk)  · @759  · 17:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply
neither country has a resident ambassador and the country comparison in the article adds no real value when these figures can be obtained from the country's own article of the CIA World Factbook. most of the third party coverage is multilateral [1]. the level of relations is very minor, the level of bilateral trade is less than USD10M [2], keep in mind some individuals easily spend more than that in 1 country. LibStar ( talk) 12:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation I have seen in almost every bilateral combination of any 2 countries that do trade even at the very small levels of these 2 countries. it is hardly something that adds greatly to proving notable bilateral relations. LibStar ( talk) 12:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 December 20. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. ( X! · talk)  · @759  · 17:12, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply
neither country has a resident ambassador and the country comparison in the article adds no real value when these figures can be obtained from the country's own article of the CIA World Factbook. most of the third party coverage is multilateral [1]. the level of relations is very minor, the level of bilateral trade is less than USD10M [2], keep in mind some individuals easily spend more than that in 1 country. LibStar ( talk) 12:50, 13 December 2009 (UTC) reply
Convention for the Avoidance of Double Taxation I have seen in almost every bilateral combination of any 2 countries that do trade even at the very small levels of these 2 countries. it is hardly something that adds greatly to proving notable bilateral relations. LibStar ( talk) 12:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply