The result was keep. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:N - no independent sources confirm any sort of a meaningful bilateral relationship. The presence of embassies is already recorded at List of diplomatic missions of Slovenia and List of diplomatic missions of Romania; their membership in NATO at Members of NATO and of the EU at Member State of the European Union. Yes, Sandoz has invested in Romania, but note that its investment is trivial enough not to have been mentioned in the Sandoz article (where it could easily be mentioned, if relevant); and yes, a Slovenian prime minister once spent two days in Romania, but these either fail the "substantial" or the "independent" requirement of WP:GNG. There's certainly not enough of a relationship that we could write about which goes much beyond the trivial. Biruitorul Talk 18:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. – Juliancolton | Talk 00:05, 10 May 2009 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:N - no independent sources confirm any sort of a meaningful bilateral relationship. The presence of embassies is already recorded at List of diplomatic missions of Slovenia and List of diplomatic missions of Romania; their membership in NATO at Members of NATO and of the EU at Member State of the European Union. Yes, Sandoz has invested in Romania, but note that its investment is trivial enough not to have been mentioned in the Sandoz article (where it could easily be mentioned, if relevant); and yes, a Slovenian prime minister once spent two days in Romania, but these either fail the "substantial" or the "independent" requirement of WP:GNG. There's certainly not enough of a relationship that we could write about which goes much beyond the trivial. Biruitorul Talk 18:08, 2 May 2009 (UTC) reply