- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 14:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Roj Blake ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A sci TV character with little or no reliable third person sources to justify notability. Dwanyewest ( talk) 02:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep There are plenty of sources for this topic including British Science Fiction Television: A Hitchhiker's Guide, Solar Flares: Science Fiction in the 1970s and A History and Critical Analysis of Blake's 7. The topic is therefore notable per the WP:GNG. Andrew ( talk) 22:11, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 09:47, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment if you are so confident that this article is notable Andrew why don't you add sources to the article to improve it? Dwanyewest ( talk) 01:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica 1000 14:33, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- Roj Blake ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A sci TV character with little or no reliable third person sources to justify notability. Dwanyewest ( talk) 02:03, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 14:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep There are plenty of sources for this topic including British Science Fiction Television: A Hitchhiker's Guide, Solar Flares: Science Fiction in the 1970s and A History and Critical Analysis of Blake's 7. The topic is therefore notable per the WP:GNG. Andrew ( talk) 22:11, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 02:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica 1000 09:47, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- Comment if you are so confident that this article is notable Andrew why don't you add sources to the article to improve it? Dwanyewest ( talk) 01:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.