- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 10:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Roger McIntire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be a vanity page. Also falls under WP:ORPHAN, as no other articles link back here. Skudrafan1 ( talk) 21:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There seems to be minimal evidence of notability. The importance of the few listed awards is not clear. There is no evidence that his authorship is widely-respected or important.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- delete. Nonnotable. Minor award, no independent refs. Staszek Lem ( talk) 00:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- delete - No major awards, no evidence books have been reviewed, noticed, or read widely. His more recent books are published by summit crossroads press, which the article states he is President of (basically they look self-published). Fyddlestix ( talk) 01:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Article does not present evidence of notability per WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. — David Eppstein ( talk) 01:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Randykitty ( talk) 10:13, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Roger McIntire ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems to be a vanity page. Also falls under WP:ORPHAN, as no other articles link back here. Skudrafan1 ( talk) 21:14, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete There seems to be minimal evidence of notability. The importance of the few listed awards is not clear. There is no evidence that his authorship is widely-respected or important.-- TonyTheTiger ( T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 00:01, 8 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:06, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, B E C K Y S A Y L E S 00:10, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- delete. Nonnotable. Minor award, no independent refs. Staszek Lem ( talk) 00:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- delete - No major awards, no evidence books have been reviewed, noticed, or read widely. His more recent books are published by summit crossroads press, which the article states he is President of (basically they look self-published). Fyddlestix ( talk) 01:43, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Article does not present evidence of notability per WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. — David Eppstein ( talk) 01:58, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.