- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Enigma msg 03:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Robert Mack
- Robert Mack ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Woefully inadequately sourced article. Searches turned up thousands of hits, but couldn't find any about this artist, apparently it's a pretty common name. Clearly does not meet WP:FILMMAKER, and not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources to show they meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 01:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 01:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 01:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete there are a few things that could establish notability. However, the first one I checked (10 pieces in the Baltimore art museum collection) turns out to be untrue. When I see such puffery and outright deception, I say delete. 104.163.159.237 ( talk) 21:49, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I also tried to verify the Baltimore Museum, and I couldn't. This would be the main thing that would establish. I also find it troubling that the body of work supposedly exhibited at BM was co-authored, but his collaborator is not mentioned. Theredproject ( talk) 19:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The above are deleting valid reliable sources based on a mischaracterization of WP:V. Verifiability means we must verify that the SOURCE says what the ARTICLE says. In the case of the source removed by 104.163.159.237, the source says what the article says. You can't negate a reliable source by performing original research. EnPassant ( talk) 14:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- An informative tidbit from the editor formerly known as Gigglesnorthotel! 104.163.137.171 ( talk) 05:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any media coverage besides museum announcements of various exhibits. Fails WP:GNG. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 18:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Enigma msg 03:54, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Robert Mack
- Robert Mack ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Woefully inadequately sourced article. Searches turned up thousands of hits, but couldn't find any about this artist, apparently it's a pretty common name. Clearly does not meet WP:FILMMAKER, and not enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable secondary sources to show they meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 01:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 01:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 01:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete there are a few things that could establish notability. However, the first one I checked (10 pieces in the Baltimore art museum collection) turns out to be untrue. When I see such puffery and outright deception, I say delete. 104.163.159.237 ( talk) 21:49, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I also tried to verify the Baltimore Museum, and I couldn't. This would be the main thing that would establish. I also find it troubling that the body of work supposedly exhibited at BM was co-authored, but his collaborator is not mentioned. Theredproject ( talk) 19:46, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Comment The above are deleting valid reliable sources based on a mischaracterization of WP:V. Verifiability means we must verify that the SOURCE says what the ARTICLE says. In the case of the source removed by 104.163.159.237, the source says what the article says. You can't negate a reliable source by performing original research. EnPassant ( talk) 14:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- An informative tidbit from the editor formerly known as Gigglesnorthotel! 104.163.137.171 ( talk) 05:49, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any media coverage besides museum announcements of various exhibits. Fails WP:GNG. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 18:57, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.