The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Another minor character clearly fails
WP:GNG. Despite being written long, sources were mostly from trivia mentions. Also at reception section, those were full of passing mentions and some listicles, thus showing zero
WP:SIGCOV.
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
13:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Can you not word it that way Zx? There was a clear attempt to find sources by whoever wrote it, but standards have improved and things are different. I reckon you wouldn't care for someone saying that about something you built based off what was seen as the standard to do things at the time. And it's not the first time you've commented like that (i.e. saying an article was more suitable for Fandom's site and had zero effort).--
Kung Fu Man (
talk)
00:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Art of Fighting#Characters per nom. While the "Reception" section looks lengthy with a multitude of sources, actually looking into it shows that these sources are extremely trivial (oftentimes a single sentence) mentions of the character, generally in the context of an overall review/overview of the games he appeared in.
Rorshacma (
talk)
15:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Another minor character clearly fails
WP:GNG. Despite being written long, sources were mostly from trivia mentions. Also at reception section, those were full of passing mentions and some listicles, thus showing zero
WP:SIGCOV.
GlatorNator (
ᴛ)
13:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Can you not word it that way Zx? There was a clear attempt to find sources by whoever wrote it, but standards have improved and things are different. I reckon you wouldn't care for someone saying that about something you built based off what was seen as the standard to do things at the time. And it's not the first time you've commented like that (i.e. saying an article was more suitable for Fandom's site and had zero effort).--
Kung Fu Man (
talk)
00:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)reply
Merge to
Art of Fighting#Characters per nom. While the "Reception" section looks lengthy with a multitude of sources, actually looking into it shows that these sources are extremely trivial (oftentimes a single sentence) mentions of the character, generally in the context of an overall review/overview of the games he appeared in.
Rorshacma (
talk)
15:11, 31 May 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.