- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Robert Akerlof
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Akerlof ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. Associate professor with middling cites on Scholar. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from parents Janet Yellen and George Akerlof. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 18:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 18:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 18:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Citability is too low, and looking at the CV [1], there is nothing else there to indicate passing WP:PROF at this point. Nsk92 ( talk) 19:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No indication of WP:PROF or other notability. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Cited 51 times with an h-index of 5. He only has one coauthor, so difficult to do subfield authorship comparisons, but I don't think that's even necessary. Pretty clearly does not meet PROF or other notability criteria. JoelleJay ( talk) 02:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As per above. Cuoxo ( talk) 15:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete being the child of a former head of the Federal Reserve is not a sign of notability. That is the only way Akerlof would pass notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠ PMC♠ (talk) 21:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Robert Akerlof
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Robert Akerlof ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to meet WP:NPROF. Associate professor with middling cites on Scholar. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from parents Janet Yellen and George Akerlof. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 18:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 18:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( ???) ( !!!) 18:58, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Citability is too low, and looking at the CV [1], there is nothing else there to indicate passing WP:PROF at this point. Nsk92 ( talk) 19:05, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. No indication of WP:PROF or other notability. — David Eppstein ( talk) 19:23, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Cited 51 times with an h-index of 5. He only has one coauthor, so difficult to do subfield authorship comparisons, but I don't think that's even necessary. Pretty clearly does not meet PROF or other notability criteria. JoelleJay ( talk) 02:59, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As per above. Cuoxo ( talk) 15:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete being the child of a former head of the Federal Reserve is not a sign of notability. That is the only way Akerlof would pass notability guidelines. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 16:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.