The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:NSCHOOL and
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Most of the coverage in the
WP:RS provided is for the shooting, not the school itself, so it makes more sense to redirect it to the event it is notable for or the school district in question. It's the same thing that we do for the Sandy Hook Elementary School article.
Love of Corey (
talk)
01:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Dunutubble: the difference is those are high schools. High schools are generally considered notable under most circumstances, see
WP:HS. However, primary and elementary schools are not considered to be notable. For example, Sandy Hook Elementary School does not have its own article.
Iamreallygoodatcheckers (
talk)
02:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Violence, murders, killings, shootings, crime, etc., are a dime-a-dozen in high schools (and colleges). Elementary schools, not so much. Much more rare.
Joseph A. Spadaro (
talk)
03:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Additionally there is reliable source information on a preschool formerly co-located with Poe, created to support Poe, to where an academic wrote a book chapter about it.
WhisperToMe (
talk)
05:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
I believe at the time of the bombing, Bath was a 1-12 school, not an elementary school. But talking about other articles here is a waste of time. Please stay on topic.
174.212.228.89 (
talk)
08:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The fact that Sandy Hook Elementary does not have its own page, only the page referencing the shooting, to me puts this into perspective. That, along with the fact that his page is simply rehashing the shooting, I support the deletion.
Sheehanpg93 (
talk)
13:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Dunutubble This school is a poor performing school is a poor area of Texas. I spent way too much time trying to get information to even begin to setup a context for the school's article let alone having some standalone notability. I would deem this as waste and instead move focus to the event.
PigSkinsAndComputers (
talk)
01:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) Redirect to
Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District; standard practice to redirect elementary schools to their respective districts. Consensus has repeatedly found there is no reason for a middle school to have its own article, let alone an elementary school. Besides having negligible encyclopedic value, having a page dedicated to the school only to have it dominated by a single, if cataclysmic, event, is totally unfair to its history.
Ovinus (
talk)
06:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) Merge to
Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District. There are notable elementary schools, but I think that the material for the article would be better contextualizad within an article on the district as a whole. The coverage of the shooting is great evidence that the shooting is notable, but notability of an organization is not inherited by a tragic and notable event merely having happened on its property. —
Ⓜ️hawk10 (
talk)
06:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect - redirect to school district. I was going to vote to keep the article since this is a unique situation but unfortunately it's not that unique, and
Sandy Hook Elementary School redirects to the district, with a hatnote directing users to the shooting. That seems like the best solution.
‡ El cid, el campeadortalk12:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete This is just plain extrem presentism. It also inherently violates not news guidelines. Beyond that, much of the article is really talking about Uvalde itself, and not the school.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
18:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: I'm a bit distracted at the moment, but searching Newspapers.com (thanks Wikipedia Library!) I was able to find in the 1970s accusations of racism against students, leading to a series of workshops between the "Anglo" (as the article described them) and Mexican-American faculty to ease tensions. They were cancelled after one meeting. Soon after, a Mexican-American teacher being let go while he ran for office as a Democrat. The school board denied the timing of the firing was related, but it sparked first a protest of 100 to 150 at the board office, followed by a walkout of roughly 450 Mexican-American students. These events received coverage in newspapers throughout the state of Texas, thanks to pickup by both the Associated Press and United Press International.
@
Clarityfiend: Thank you for finding these! See if you can write prose about this and put it in the article. It may be possible to use articles to build a case of notability for this school.
WhisperToMe (
talk)
19:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Reviewing those sources, it appears the case was against the school board for the district, and the school receives only passing mention once in each article. I think it's the type of detail that would be suitable for the school district's page, but it doesn't seem like significant coverage of the school itself.
RunningTiger123 (
talk)
22:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
I've been unable to find when the school was built, but references appear as early as 1963.
If I wrote this up, and potentially found other widely-covered or elsewise notable headlines, is this likely to save the article? --
Zanimum (
talk)
22:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) Probably not; that would still fall under
routine coverage, and it doesn't have much lasting notability. Notability for individual elementary schools is extremely difficult to achieve. But if the article is redirected (and it probably will) then it could be included in the school district article.
Ovinus (
talk)
23:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Checkers, why do you care if this school has an article? Sandy Hook is in the news enough it should have a stand alone article. You don't understand notability at all.
Pictureperfect2 (
talk)
12:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect Seems like common sense; we very rarely have elementary school articles, and the tragic events don't change the fact that routine statistics about students and faculty don't warrant a standalone article. The district article should be able to cover that and whatever old news articles that could be dug up (just like they could for many elementaries).
Reywas92Talk15:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment The school seems like a valid topic for an article. I found the article because I am interested in aspects of the school that are not part of the news about the recent event. And why should the "why" of why I look for an article be part of what validates its presence on wikipedia? It should be enough that somebody would look it up in an encyclopedia, paper or otherwise, and for any reason at all. That some, or even much, of the content refers to the event may be grounds for providing a redirect, or to argue that the article needs some work, nothing more. We do not delete the article about Chicago because it also describes the Chicago fire, nor the one on NYC because it dares to mention 9/11. Deletion quite obviously, would seem overtly heavy handed, inappropriate, and a gross disservice to the community
DrKN1 (
talk)
23:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Being a "valid topic" for an article is not our criteria for keeping an article here. We have notability guidelines and many editors here say that this school does not meet them. Your examples of Chicago or New York City don't make any sense as those topics are clearly notable.
Natg 19 (
talk)
18:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Per
WP:NSCHOOL and
WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Most of the coverage in the
WP:RS provided is for the shooting, not the school itself, so it makes more sense to redirect it to the event it is notable for or the school district in question. It's the same thing that we do for the Sandy Hook Elementary School article.
Love of Corey (
talk)
01:31, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Dunutubble: the difference is those are high schools. High schools are generally considered notable under most circumstances, see
WP:HS. However, primary and elementary schools are not considered to be notable. For example, Sandy Hook Elementary School does not have its own article.
Iamreallygoodatcheckers (
talk)
02:00, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Violence, murders, killings, shootings, crime, etc., are a dime-a-dozen in high schools (and colleges). Elementary schools, not so much. Much more rare.
Joseph A. Spadaro (
talk)
03:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Additionally there is reliable source information on a preschool formerly co-located with Poe, created to support Poe, to where an academic wrote a book chapter about it.
WhisperToMe (
talk)
05:38, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
I believe at the time of the bombing, Bath was a 1-12 school, not an elementary school. But talking about other articles here is a waste of time. Please stay on topic.
174.212.228.89 (
talk)
08:48, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The fact that Sandy Hook Elementary does not have its own page, only the page referencing the shooting, to me puts this into perspective. That, along with the fact that his page is simply rehashing the shooting, I support the deletion.
Sheehanpg93 (
talk)
13:41, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
@
Dunutubble This school is a poor performing school is a poor area of Texas. I spent way too much time trying to get information to even begin to setup a context for the school's article let alone having some standalone notability. I would deem this as waste and instead move focus to the event.
PigSkinsAndComputers (
talk)
01:56, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) Redirect to
Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District; standard practice to redirect elementary schools to their respective districts. Consensus has repeatedly found there is no reason for a middle school to have its own article, let alone an elementary school. Besides having negligible encyclopedic value, having a page dedicated to the school only to have it dominated by a single, if cataclysmic, event, is totally unfair to its history.
Ovinus (
talk)
06:16, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) Merge to
Uvalde Consolidated Independent School District. There are notable elementary schools, but I think that the material for the article would be better contextualizad within an article on the district as a whole. The coverage of the shooting is great evidence that the shooting is notable, but notability of an organization is not inherited by a tragic and notable event merely having happened on its property. —
Ⓜ️hawk10 (
talk)
06:18, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect - redirect to school district. I was going to vote to keep the article since this is a unique situation but unfortunately it's not that unique, and
Sandy Hook Elementary School redirects to the district, with a hatnote directing users to the shooting. That seems like the best solution.
‡ El cid, el campeadortalk12:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Delete This is just plain extrem presentism. It also inherently violates not news guidelines. Beyond that, much of the article is really talking about Uvalde itself, and not the school.
John Pack Lambert (
talk)
18:06, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment: I'm a bit distracted at the moment, but searching Newspapers.com (thanks Wikipedia Library!) I was able to find in the 1970s accusations of racism against students, leading to a series of workshops between the "Anglo" (as the article described them) and Mexican-American faculty to ease tensions. They were cancelled after one meeting. Soon after, a Mexican-American teacher being let go while he ran for office as a Democrat. The school board denied the timing of the firing was related, but it sparked first a protest of 100 to 150 at the board office, followed by a walkout of roughly 450 Mexican-American students. These events received coverage in newspapers throughout the state of Texas, thanks to pickup by both the Associated Press and United Press International.
@
Clarityfiend: Thank you for finding these! See if you can write prose about this and put it in the article. It may be possible to use articles to build a case of notability for this school.
WhisperToMe (
talk)
19:13, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Reviewing those sources, it appears the case was against the school board for the district, and the school receives only passing mention once in each article. I think it's the type of detail that would be suitable for the school district's page, but it doesn't seem like significant coverage of the school itself.
RunningTiger123 (
talk)
22:48, 26 May 2022 (UTC)reply
I've been unable to find when the school was built, but references appear as early as 1963.
If I wrote this up, and potentially found other widely-covered or elsewise notable headlines, is this likely to save the article? --
Zanimum (
talk)
22:46, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
(
edit conflict) Probably not; that would still fall under
routine coverage, and it doesn't have much lasting notability. Notability for individual elementary schools is extremely difficult to achieve. But if the article is redirected (and it probably will) then it could be included in the school district article.
Ovinus (
talk)
23:33, 25 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Checkers, why do you care if this school has an article? Sandy Hook is in the news enough it should have a stand alone article. You don't understand notability at all.
Pictureperfect2 (
talk)
12:38, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Redirect Seems like common sense; we very rarely have elementary school articles, and the tragic events don't change the fact that routine statistics about students and faculty don't warrant a standalone article. The district article should be able to cover that and whatever old news articles that could be dug up (just like they could for many elementaries).
Reywas92Talk15:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Comment The school seems like a valid topic for an article. I found the article because I am interested in aspects of the school that are not part of the news about the recent event. And why should the "why" of why I look for an article be part of what validates its presence on wikipedia? It should be enough that somebody would look it up in an encyclopedia, paper or otherwise, and for any reason at all. That some, or even much, of the content refers to the event may be grounds for providing a redirect, or to argue that the article needs some work, nothing more. We do not delete the article about Chicago because it also describes the Chicago fire, nor the one on NYC because it dares to mention 9/11. Deletion quite obviously, would seem overtly heavy handed, inappropriate, and a gross disservice to the community
DrKN1 (
talk)
23:33, 27 May 2022 (UTC)reply
Being a "valid topic" for an article is not our criteria for keeping an article here. We have notability guidelines and many editors here say that this school does not meet them. Your examples of Chicago or New York City don't make any sense as those topics are clearly notable.
Natg 19 (
talk)
18:33, 28 May 2022 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.