The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 00:46, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete per google failure.
Polarpanda (
talk) 09:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - I think Glenfarclas said it all. Nothing to establish widespread, significant third-party coverage to merit inclusion. On this basis, I feel that deletion is suitable. Cocytus[»talk«] 02:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (
talk) 00:46, 22 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete per google failure.
Polarpanda (
talk) 09:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)reply
Delete - I think Glenfarclas said it all. Nothing to establish widespread, significant third-party coverage to merit inclusion. On this basis, I feel that deletion is suitable. Cocytus[»talk«] 02:54, 21 December 2009 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.