From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Riverview, Fresno County, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What "still shows up" on the 1923 topo is a single building, apparently at the end of a long driveway; some of this still shows up in the 1960s aerials, when the country club was be built, but there's nothing on any map that suggests this was a settlement beyond a single farm or the like. Searching turns up nothing; the name is too generic and most hits are for developments which apparently were elsewhere. Mangoe ( talk) 21:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete Citation is this map (top left), which is no basis for a notable place. Reywas92 Talk 19:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I agree with Reywas92 that the Bullard 1:31680, 1921 Quadrangle is not evidence of a notable place for this item. I searched JSTOR, Goggle Scholar, and Internet Archive and found nothing of any significance like Mangoe. I did find a reference to a "Riverview, California" in a journal article. However, it is in reference to a "Riverview Highschool." Even that name is an alias used by a researcher to hide the school's real name and protect the student's privacy. Paul H. ( talk) 04:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Meets WP:GNG. This refers to a town founded in the 1887 boom, it was fully staked out with over 1,000 lots sold but never actually got built. Discussed in detail in [1], (contemporary source here). If a merge target is desired I'd suggest Herndon, California as sources have the actual location of Riverview as being on the north bank by the railroad bridge opposite Herndon, which is just under three miles west of the co-ords given in the article.---- Pontificalibus 17:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 03:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: per nom. Fails GEOLAND and GNG. The nom does a good job of researching these articles. No objection to a redirect if the closer thinks a suitable target has been proposed, but there is nothing here to merge.  //  Timothy ::  talk  16:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Riverview, Fresno County, California (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What "still shows up" on the 1923 topo is a single building, apparently at the end of a long driveway; some of this still shows up in the 1960s aerials, when the country club was be built, but there's nothing on any map that suggests this was a settlement beyond a single farm or the like. Searching turns up nothing; the name is too generic and most hits are for developments which apparently were elsewhere. Mangoe ( talk) 21:56, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 22:00, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Speedy delete Citation is this map (top left), which is no basis for a notable place. Reywas92 Talk 19:14, 3 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete I agree with Reywas92 that the Bullard 1:31680, 1921 Quadrangle is not evidence of a notable place for this item. I searched JSTOR, Goggle Scholar, and Internet Archive and found nothing of any significance like Mangoe. I did find a reference to a "Riverview, California" in a journal article. However, it is in reference to a "Riverview Highschool." Even that name is an alias used by a researcher to hide the school's real name and protect the student's privacy. Paul H. ( talk) 04:47, 4 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Meets WP:GNG. This refers to a town founded in the 1887 boom, it was fully staked out with over 1,000 lots sold but never actually got built. Discussed in detail in [1], (contemporary source here). If a merge target is desired I'd suggest Herndon, California as sources have the actual location of Riverview as being on the north bank by the railroad bridge opposite Herndon, which is just under three miles west of the co-ords given in the article.---- Pontificalibus 17:52, 5 March 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel ( talk) 03:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: per nom. Fails GEOLAND and GNG. The nom does a good job of researching these articles. No objection to a redirect if the closer thinks a suitable target has been proposed, but there is nothing here to merge.  //  Timothy ::  talk  16:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook