The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete but has potential to be a well written BLP in future should wish to take the time and energy. Seddon talk| WikimediaUK 04:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Buddhist Lopon ( acharya) and scholar. The subject has requested deletion because of the insertion of improperly sourced negative information by an IP. When the subject removed the material, their change was repeatedly reverted. Judging by the lack of references and the page view stats from before the insertion of the defamatory material, this is a BLP Wikipedia can live without. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 21:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. Clear consensus to delete but has potential to be a well written BLP in future should wish to take the time and energy. Seddon talk| WikimediaUK 04:35, 24 December 2011 (UTC) reply
Buddhist Lopon ( acharya) and scholar. The subject has requested deletion because of the insertion of improperly sourced negative information by an IP. When the subject removed the material, their change was repeatedly reverted. Judging by the lack of references and the page view stats from before the insertion of the defamatory material, this is a BLP Wikipedia can live without. Delicious carbuncle ( talk) 21:38, 17 December 2011 (UTC) reply