The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Swarm♠ 04:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
This article does not cite any outside sources. The bands page (origin for this album) also has not established significance or notability and has been nominated as well.
Garchy (
talk) 19:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 18:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best as the band itself was also questionably notable, two reviews for this current album article but it's still questionable.
SwisterTwistertalk 03:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Swarm♠ 04:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
This article does not cite any outside sources. The bands page (origin for this album) also has not established significance or notability and has been nominated as well.
Garchy (
talk) 19:35, 21 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Natg 19 (
talk) 18:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete at best as the band itself was also questionably notable, two reviews for this current album article but it's still questionable.
SwisterTwistertalk 03:06, 4 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.