From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid counter-argument to a lack of notability. ♠ PMC(talk) 08:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Rick Sollars

Rick Sollars (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a smalltown mayor, not reliably sourced as the subject of enough media coverage to get over WP:NPOL #2. As always, mayors are not handed an automatic notability freebie just because they exist -- the key to making a mayor notable enough for a Wikipedia article is to write a substantive and well-sourced article that demonstrates his political significance. But other than stating that he exists, the only other content here is a criminal allegation that has not verifiably resulted in a conviction, and would very likely not be of any enduring importance to get him over the WP:PERP bar even if it had. But merely being charged with a crime is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself -- if the person did not already clear our notability standards, then being charged with a crime that has not led to a conviction is not a notability booster. And there's just one footnote here anyway, which is nowhere close to enough coverage to make a smalltown mayor notable even if it weren't about an as yet untried criminal allegation. Bearcat ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid counter-argument to a lack of notability. ♠ PMC(talk) 08:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC) reply

Rick Sollars

Rick Sollars (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a smalltown mayor, not reliably sourced as the subject of enough media coverage to get over WP:NPOL #2. As always, mayors are not handed an automatic notability freebie just because they exist -- the key to making a mayor notable enough for a Wikipedia article is to write a substantive and well-sourced article that demonstrates his political significance. But other than stating that he exists, the only other content here is a criminal allegation that has not verifiably resulted in a conviction, and would very likely not be of any enduring importance to get him over the WP:PERP bar even if it had. But merely being charged with a crime is not grounds for a Wikipedia article in and of itself -- if the person did not already clear our notability standards, then being charged with a crime that has not led to a conviction is not a notability booster. And there's just one footnote here anyway, which is nowhere close to enough coverage to make a smalltown mayor notable even if it weren't about an as yet untried criminal allegation. Bearcat ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. Bearcat ( talk) 03:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook