- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:48, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Richmond First
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richmond First ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local political group that fields candidates for the Richmond, British Columbia city council. Fails WP:NORG; deleted as WP:A7 in 2019. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. -- Cewbot ( talk) 00:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Logs:
2019-08 ✗ A7
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:48, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Richmond First
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Richmond First ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Local political group that fields candidates for the Richmond, British Columbia city council. Fails WP:NORG; deleted as WP:A7 in 2019. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings ( talk) 03:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. -- Cewbot ( talk) 00:04, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
- Logs:
2019-08 ✗ A7
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.