The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per
WP:SK#1, the nominator
withdrew their deletion nomination, and there are no outstanding !delete votes. (
non-admin closure)
Mz7 (
talk) 00:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - I strongly support
Oakshade. It is a well referenced article with valuable information. There is no good reason for deletion of this article. The article should be renamed 'Rewari-Rohtak line'. -
Chandan Guha (
talk) 04:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Withdraw nomination, but rename since (as not clear in original article) this is a major infrastructure project.
TheLongTone (
talk) 09:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Per
WP:SK#1, the nominator
withdrew their deletion nomination, and there are no outstanding !delete votes. (
non-admin closure)
Mz7 (
talk) 00:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep - I strongly support
Oakshade. It is a well referenced article with valuable information. There is no good reason for deletion of this article. The article should be renamed 'Rewari-Rohtak line'. -
Chandan Guha (
talk) 04:26, 27 March 2014 (UTC)reply
Withdraw nomination, but rename since (as not clear in original article) this is a major infrastructure project.
TheLongTone (
talk) 09:27, 27 March 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.