From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed nomination  Sandstein  22:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Revolving armature alternator

Revolving armature alternator (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can anyone please explain what this article is about?

Alternator is notable and we have an article on it.

As a specific type of alternator, this alternator makes too little sense to even begin to clean it up (see Talk:).

As one local installation of alternators, it might make some sense but would be better merged to Folsom Powerhouse State Historic Park. However that article already appears to contain everything useful from here. Andy Dingley ( talk) 15:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. shoy ( reactions) 15:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Delete. The topic may be notable as I've seen some sources giving it passing mention. It doesn't appear notable enough for it's own article, but would be relevant as a small rewritten subsection the alternator that could be considered for a split if it ever reached that point. Kingofaces43 ( talk) 15:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unopposed nomination  Sandstein  22:17, 27 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Revolving armature alternator

Revolving armature alternator (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can anyone please explain what this article is about?

Alternator is notable and we have an article on it.

As a specific type of alternator, this alternator makes too little sense to even begin to clean it up (see Talk:).

As one local installation of alternators, it might make some sense but would be better merged to Folsom Powerhouse State Historic Park. However that article already appears to contain everything useful from here. Andy Dingley ( talk) 15:33, 4 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 13:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. shoy ( reactions) 15:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Delete. The topic may be notable as I've seen some sources giving it passing mention. It doesn't appear notable enough for it's own article, but would be relevant as a small rewritten subsection the alternator that could be considered for a split if it ever reached that point. Kingofaces43 ( talk) 15:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 03:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook