- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable journal. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 20:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 20:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Very weak keep Legit peer-reviewed journal, and articles often get cited a decent number of times [1]; but I can't find anything about its general impact, h-index is not available due to lack of indexing, and the one sorta-kinda selective indexer ( Emerging Sources Citation Index) is generally regarded here as only just scraping in under the definition. So, extending benefit of the doubt, keep. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 20:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Not indexed in any selective databases ( [2]), very modest citation record, no independent sources. Misses WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. -- Randykitty ( talk) 21:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough indepth coverage available. GooeyMitch ( talk) 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete can’t find anything that suggests notability. -- Devoke water 23:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 03:35, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable journal. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 20:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Nearlyevil665 ( talk) 20:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Peru-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Very weak keep Legit peer-reviewed journal, and articles often get cited a decent number of times [1]; but I can't find anything about its general impact, h-index is not available due to lack of indexing, and the one sorta-kinda selective indexer ( Emerging Sources Citation Index) is generally regarded here as only just scraping in under the definition. So, extending benefit of the doubt, keep. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 20:23, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Not indexed in any selective databases ( [2]), very modest citation record, no independent sources. Misses WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. -- Randykitty ( talk) 21:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Not enough indepth coverage available. GooeyMitch ( talk) 15:52, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete can’t find anything that suggests notability. -- Devoke water 23:26, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.