The result was soft delete. Due to low community involvement in this discussion will treat the nomination as an expired proposed deletion, with the understanding that anyone who contests the deletion may request undeletion for any reason. J04n( talk page) 12:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC) reply
This article has existed practically untouched since August 2005. I really don't think Wikipedia needs an article about an individual toolbar. It may meet WP:N, as lots of online help articles would have been written about it, but I think WP:IINFO starts to apply here. Any relevant information about this toolbar should be placed in the Microsoft Office article, or the article about a specific version of Office (since this toolbar has not been present in the last three releases of Microsoft Office) - however the fact that nothing has been said about this toolbar for 7 years is not encouraging. — This, that and the other (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was soft delete. Due to low community involvement in this discussion will treat the nomination as an expired proposed deletion, with the understanding that anyone who contests the deletion may request undeletion for any reason. J04n( talk page) 12:55, 31 March 2013 (UTC) reply
This article has existed practically untouched since August 2005. I really don't think Wikipedia needs an article about an individual toolbar. It may meet WP:N, as lots of online help articles would have been written about it, but I think WP:IINFO starts to apply here. Any relevant information about this toolbar should be placed in the Microsoft Office article, or the article about a specific version of Office (since this toolbar has not been present in the last three releases of Microsoft Office) - however the fact that nothing has been said about this toolbar for 7 years is not encouraging. — This, that and the other (talk) 09:38, 23 March 2013 (UTC) reply