- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Sandstein 09:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Rete celere del Canton Ticino
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rete celere del Canton Ticino ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a concept that doesn't quite exist. All the rail services listed are real, but there's no evidence that they are part of a formal network with an official name. This was discussed in some depth at Talk:Rete celere del Canton Ticino#Naming - Renaming. It looks like an S-Bahn network but reliable sources don't treat it that way. The article should be split, with the content moving to Treni Regionali Ticino Lombardia, Lugano–Ponte Tresa Railway, or individual articles about the services themselves (such as RE80 and S90 (TILO), newly-created. This could be done editorially but this is a disruptive change to a long-standing article and would benefit from broader participation and a formal discussion. Mackensen (talk) 16:33, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Just i yaya 16:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Just i yaya 16:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Just i yaya 16:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Sandstein 09:43, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Rete celere del Canton Ticino
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rete celere del Canton Ticino ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a concept that doesn't quite exist. All the rail services listed are real, but there's no evidence that they are part of a formal network with an official name. This was discussed in some depth at Talk:Rete celere del Canton Ticino#Naming - Renaming. It looks like an S-Bahn network but reliable sources don't treat it that way. The article should be split, with the content moving to Treni Regionali Ticino Lombardia, Lugano–Ponte Tresa Railway, or individual articles about the services themselves (such as RE80 and S90 (TILO), newly-created. This could be done editorially but this is a disruptive change to a long-standing article and would benefit from broader participation and a formal discussion. Mackensen (talk) 16:33, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Just i yaya 16:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Just i yaya 16:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Just i yaya 16:39, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗ plicit 23:58, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.