- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#G11. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Repixeling
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Repixeling ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is some covert WP:ARTSPAM for a term that, as far as I can tell, isn't notable, widely used or covered outside of the companies trying to push it. Also WP:ESSAY definitely applies. Praxidicae ( talk) 14:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Praxidicae is correct. This is not a term being used widely - searches for both "repixel" and "repixeling" (when used with quotes) along with "retargeting" turn up basically nothing on this term outside of one company, and its founders attempts to spread mentions elsewhere. The article creator has been blocked for a promotional username and promotional editing. I don't think the article is as blatantly promotional as others seem to, but the term doesn't meet the notability threshold. I'd normally be inclined to redirect to site retargeting, but there's simply no use outside this company that I can find to support that. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Was clearly made to popularize their Repixel site on Wikipedia, that counts as advertising Daiyusha ( talk) 15:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass WP:GNG and is a disguised advert as the first reference (now deleted) went to the sales site of the company promoting this advertising system, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 16:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy deleted in accordance with WP:CSD#G11. ~ Anachronist ( talk) 23:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Repixeling
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Repixeling ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is some covert WP:ARTSPAM for a term that, as far as I can tell, isn't notable, widely used or covered outside of the companies trying to push it. Also WP:ESSAY definitely applies. Praxidicae ( talk) 14:09, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:45, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - Praxidicae is correct. This is not a term being used widely - searches for both "repixel" and "repixeling" (when used with quotes) along with "retargeting" turn up basically nothing on this term outside of one company, and its founders attempts to spread mentions elsewhere. The article creator has been blocked for a promotional username and promotional editing. I don't think the article is as blatantly promotional as others seem to, but the term doesn't meet the notability threshold. I'd normally be inclined to redirect to site retargeting, but there's simply no use outside this company that I can find to support that. MarginalCost ( talk) 14:55, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete Was clearly made to popularize their Repixel site on Wikipedia, that counts as advertising Daiyusha ( talk) 15:16, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete does not pass WP:GNG and is a disguised advert as the first reference (now deleted) went to the sales site of the company promoting this advertising system, thanks Atlantic306 ( talk) 16:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.