- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The article was nominated just a few days ago (
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RentAHitman.com) with the exactly same concern, and was unanimously kept. Per
Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure, speedy keep applies when re-nominating the same page with the same arguments immediately after they were strongly rejected in a recently closed deletion discussion.
(non-admin closure)
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 07:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
RentAHitman.com
- RentAHitman.com ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- Promotion of criminal services in a provocative manner. Article is nothing more than copies of crime reports and interview. There's no sources to corroborate the notability of the site itself. "Satirical website" — men received jail sentences. Wikipedia is no place for anonymous police operations. ~ujqy ( talk) 01:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, here we go again less than 24 hours after the last AfD was closed as keep. I suspect the nominator is the same as User:~ujqy who nominated it last time (same pattern of edits in nominating this article and creating a user page with a random character as the only content) and possibly User:Projavik another recently created account that has only edited in relation to this article. If so I suggest they read our policy at Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry.
- Nominator claims that the "Article is nothing more than copies of crime reports and interview" and "There's no sources to corroborate the notability of the site itself". I have sourced the article to WP:Reliable Sources including The Guardian, The Washington Post and Rolling Stone, which are high quality independent news sites. The coverage is more than simple crime reports and contains full profiles of the website and its founder, demonstrating WP:SIGCOV. The claim that the article promotes "criminal services" is nonsense (and not a WP:DELREASON anyway), the website provides no criminal services - Dumelow ( talk) 07:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The article was nominated just a few days ago (
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RentAHitman.com) with the exactly same concern, and was unanimously kept. Per
Wikipedia:Deletion process#Early closure, speedy keep applies when re-nominating the same page with the same arguments immediately after they were strongly rejected in a recently closed deletion discussion.
(non-admin closure)
Kavyansh.Singh (
talk) 07:28, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
RentAHitman.com
- RentAHitman.com ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- Promotion of criminal services in a provocative manner. Article is nothing more than copies of crime reports and interview. There's no sources to corroborate the notability of the site itself. "Satirical website" — men received jail sentences. Wikipedia is no place for anonymous police operations. ~ujqy ( talk) 01:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, here we go again less than 24 hours after the last AfD was closed as keep. I suspect the nominator is the same as User:~ujqy who nominated it last time (same pattern of edits in nominating this article and creating a user page with a random character as the only content) and possibly User:Projavik another recently created account that has only edited in relation to this article. If so I suggest they read our policy at Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry.
- Nominator claims that the "Article is nothing more than copies of crime reports and interview" and "There's no sources to corroborate the notability of the site itself". I have sourced the article to WP:Reliable Sources including The Guardian, The Washington Post and Rolling Stone, which are high quality independent news sites. The coverage is more than simple crime reports and contains full profiles of the website and its founder, demonstrating WP:SIGCOV. The claim that the article promotes "criminal services" is nonsense (and not a WP:DELREASON anyway), the website provides no criminal services - Dumelow ( talk) 07:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.