The result was closed as article has been speedy deleted by another administrator. Bearcat ( talk) 20:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized article about a writer and artist, not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for writers or artists. As always, neither writers nor artists are "inherently" notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because their work exists -- notability has to be supported by evidence that the person has received external coverage and analysis to validate their significance, such as major literary or arts awards and/or the reception of enough media coverage about them and their work to pass
WP:GNG.
But there are just three footnotes here, of which two are online bookstores that are not support for notability at all, and the third comes from a minor niche publication that would be fine for use if there were better sources alongside it, but is not significant enough to singlehandedly get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only secondary source on the table.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have considerably better sourcing than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
The result was closed as article has been speedy deleted by another administrator. Bearcat ( talk) 20:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
Semi-advertorialized article about a writer and artist, not
properly sourced as passing our inclusion criteria for writers or artists. As always, neither writers nor artists are "inherently" notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because their work exists -- notability has to be supported by evidence that the person has received external coverage and analysis to validate their significance, such as major literary or arts awards and/or the reception of enough media coverage about them and their work to pass
WP:GNG.
But there are just three footnotes here, of which two are online bookstores that are not support for notability at all, and the third comes from a minor niche publication that would be fine for use if there were better sources alongside it, but is not significant enough to singlehandedly get her over GNG all by itself if it's the only secondary source on the table.
Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt her from having to have considerably better sourcing than this.
Bearcat (
talk) 18:53, 10 May 2023 (UTC)