The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Small regional chain, no evidence of notability DGG (
talk ) 03:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete I live in that area and while I have heard of them I don't think they pass our guidelines for companies yet.
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete. I see it has at least 10 sources, some from notable companies. Though also, it seems to include promotional content according to
WP:SPAM in the 'mission' and the
WP:LEAD.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Small regional chain, no evidence of notability DGG (
talk ) 03:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete I live in that area and while I have heard of them I don't think they pass our guidelines for companies yet.
Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)reply
Weak Delete. I see it has at least 10 sources, some from notable companies. Though also, it seems to include promotional content according to
WP:SPAM in the 'mission' and the
WP:LEAD.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.