From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of 07:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Reiko Senou (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Working voice actress, no sign she passes either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Was de-prodded with the following rationale: "Improving; I object because the Chinese Wikipedia has the best Japanese celebrities and she has one". However, that addressed neither of the above two concerns. Onel5969 TT me 15:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 05:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 16:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete For once the English article contains just as many roles as the Ja.wiki age, which makes this a lot easier. I can't see anything suggesting notability by our standards, although I'm open to changing that view if information develops. The deprod rationale is poor even when making some sense of it - the existence of articles on other wiki's has no bearing unless they contain information of use to this discussion. SephyTheThird ( talk) 17:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of 07:49, 16 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Reiko Senou (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Working voice actress, no sign she passes either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR. Was de-prodded with the following rationale: "Improving; I object because the Chinese Wikipedia has the best Japanese celebrities and she has one". However, that addressed neither of the above two concerns. Onel5969 TT me 15:53, 26 December 2016 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple ( talk) 05:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 06:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 05:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF ( barksniff) 16:05, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
  • Delete For once the English article contains just as many roles as the Ja.wiki age, which makes this a lot easier. I can't see anything suggesting notability by our standards, although I'm open to changing that view if information develops. The deprod rationale is poor even when making some sense of it - the existence of articles on other wiki's has no bearing unless they contain information of use to this discussion. SephyTheThird ( talk) 17:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook