The result was Keep. This was a messy nomination. The statement by the nom that this article contains information that is also covered in other articles and does not go as indepth is silly. Look at Science, Philosophy, Tools, Music etc. This discussion, which was not going anywhere, did not arrive at a consensus which made deletion the proper course of action. It was more of a collaborative discussion of highly-technical content points, the kind of thing that should happen on a talk page, not in a deletion process. So my choices were no consensus or keep, and the very weak nomination leaned me over to keep. They are essentially the same thing anyway. JERRY talk contribs 04:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete This article contains information and is on a topic that is on several other wikipedia articles including Tone (linguistics), Tone language, and Vocal registration. The information presented is not as thoroughly or precisly presented as in the other articles and there are no references cited so any merger would be pointless. Nrswanson ( talk) 16:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Keep. This was a messy nomination. The statement by the nom that this article contains information that is also covered in other articles and does not go as indepth is silly. Look at Science, Philosophy, Tools, Music etc. This discussion, which was not going anywhere, did not arrive at a consensus which made deletion the proper course of action. It was more of a collaborative discussion of highly-technical content points, the kind of thing that should happen on a talk page, not in a deletion process. So my choices were no consensus or keep, and the very weak nomination leaned me over to keep. They are essentially the same thing anyway. JERRY talk contribs 04:22, 21 February 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete This article contains information and is on a topic that is on several other wikipedia articles including Tone (linguistics), Tone language, and Vocal registration. The information presented is not as thoroughly or precisly presented as in the other articles and there are no references cited so any merger would be pointless. Nrswanson ( talk) 16:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC) reply