From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 04:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Regency Tower (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:NGEO. No significant coverage of the building in WP:RS, unless I'm looking in the wrong places. – DarkGlow19:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow19:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow19:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep passes WP:GNG with the sources presented by NemesisAT. TipsyElephant ( talk) 01:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Per the sources provided, it passes WP:NBUILDING as it was one of the structures most heavily impacted by the Oklahoma City Bombing aside from the Murrah Building and can justifiably be included within the historical scope of it, thus fulfilling the notability criteria for its historicity. Furthermore, it is the largest residential building in a top 25 US city, which lends to its social and economic importance. Pona12 ( talk) 12:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 ( talk) 04:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Regency Tower (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to satisfy WP:NGEO. No significant coverage of the building in WP:RS, unless I'm looking in the wrong places. – DarkGlow19:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow19:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow19:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC) reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 00:27, 13 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep passes WP:GNG with the sources presented by NemesisAT. TipsyElephant ( talk) 01:29, 13 September 2021 (UTC) reply
  • Keep Per the sources provided, it passes WP:NBUILDING as it was one of the structures most heavily impacted by the Oklahoma City Bombing aside from the Murrah Building and can justifiably be included within the historical scope of it, thus fulfilling the notability criteria for its historicity. Furthermore, it is the largest residential building in a top 25 US city, which lends to its social and economic importance. Pona12 ( talk) 12:36, 16 September 2021 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook