- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Reform Party of California
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Reform Party of California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable state branch of a notable federal party. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Toa Nidhiki05 14:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Toa Nidhiki05 14:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Toa Nidhiki05 14:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Previous AfD with "no consensus" featured arguments such as "We had a State Conference just prior to Christmas 2009." as rationale for keeping. Not notable as a separate organisation and notability is not inherited from the national party. AusLondonder ( talk) 18:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete nothing to indicate this is an actual notable political party. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Per Nom. I don't see anything worth preserving by merging to Reform Party of the United States of America#Active state affiliates as an ATD. The latest membership is outdated as shown from 2012. The organizations website appears to have been last active in 2014. -- Otr500 ( talk) 06:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗ plicit 14:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Reform Party of California
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Reform Party of California ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable state branch of a notable federal party. Fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Toa Nidhiki05 14:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Toa Nidhiki05 14:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Toa Nidhiki05 14:14, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood ( talk) 15:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Previous AfD with "no consensus" featured arguments such as "We had a State Conference just prior to Christmas 2009." as rationale for keeping. Not notable as a separate organisation and notability is not inherited from the national party. AusLondonder ( talk) 18:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete nothing to indicate this is an actual notable political party. John Pack Lambert ( talk) 14:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Per Nom. I don't see anything worth preserving by merging to Reform Party of the United States of America#Active state affiliates as an ATD. The latest membership is outdated as shown from 2012. The organizations website appears to have been last active in 2014. -- Otr500 ( talk) 06:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.