The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article is about a non-notable development team and relies on two possibly primary sources for its information, and it has been this way since 2007. A WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing extra, so even if these sources weren't primary, it'd still be a
WP:N failure per the
WP:THREE recommendation.
NegativeMP1 22:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. A self-promo article that has sit forgotten for decades. --
ferret (
talk) 23:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. I don't think those sources meet the
WP:RS standard, so it's just a vanity article. —
HelloAnnyong(say whaaat?!) 03:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Obvious COI article. Not much about the studio can be found, even in gaming magazines. I cannot rule out that news articles may exist, but the article creator must demonstrate that and didn't.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 11:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Move to
Karen Crowther and expand. Based on the articles shown, it appears to be her that is notable, not the studio label she operates under. I assume she didn't make an article on herself because she wanted to promote her game label, but it's clear from the sources it's a one-person label.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 23:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to review newly found sources and consider Move suggestion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 21:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Move to
Karen Crowther. Sources presented by DigitalIceAge meet
WP:GNG marginally. I'd additionally consider her to be notable per
WP:AUTHOR.
PaulT2022 (
talk) 00:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect/Merge into
Karen Crowther. I agree with PaulT2022 and Zxcvbnm; the sources meet GNG for Karen Crowther rather than Redwood Games. The abstract for the 1000+ word article starts with "Features Karen Crowther of Redwood Games Inc", and the
Ukiah Daily Journal article is about her achievements, mentioning that she "recently" founded Redwood Games. I think a redirect would be more appropriate, so I
boldly went ahead and started an article so that there was something to redirect/merge into, if needed. -
Whisperjanes (
talk) 05:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Move to Karen Crowther because it's borderline but is probably a good addition there.
BuySomeApples (
talk) 16:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Article is about a non-notable development team and relies on two possibly primary sources for its information, and it has been this way since 2007. A WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing extra, so even if these sources weren't primary, it'd still be a
WP:N failure per the
WP:THREE recommendation.
NegativeMP1 22:43, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom. A self-promo article that has sit forgotten for decades. --
ferret (
talk) 23:03, 26 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete. I don't think those sources meet the
WP:RS standard, so it's just a vanity article. —
HelloAnnyong(say whaaat?!) 03:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete Obvious COI article. Not much about the studio can be found, even in gaming magazines. I cannot rule out that news articles may exist, but the article creator must demonstrate that and didn't.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 11:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Move to
Karen Crowther and expand. Based on the articles shown, it appears to be her that is notable, not the studio label she operates under. I assume she didn't make an article on herself because she wanted to promote her game label, but it's clear from the sources it's a one-person label.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (
ᴛ) 23:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Relisting to review newly found sources and consider Move suggestion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LizRead!Talk! 21:26, 2 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Move to
Karen Crowther. Sources presented by DigitalIceAge meet
WP:GNG marginally. I'd additionally consider her to be notable per
WP:AUTHOR.
PaulT2022 (
talk) 00:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Redirect/Merge into
Karen Crowther. I agree with PaulT2022 and Zxcvbnm; the sources meet GNG for Karen Crowther rather than Redwood Games. The abstract for the 1000+ word article starts with "Features Karen Crowther of Redwood Games Inc", and the
Ukiah Daily Journal article is about her achievements, mentioning that she "recently" founded Redwood Games. I think a redirect would be more appropriate, so I
boldly went ahead and started an article so that there was something to redirect/merge into, if needed. -
Whisperjanes (
talk) 05:14, 6 January 2024 (UTC)reply
Move to Karen Crowther because it's borderline but is probably a good addition there.
BuySomeApples (
talk) 16:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.