- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Red Island Minerals
- Red Island Minerals ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company. Created by SPA COI editor. Little content. Little independent coverage. Rayman60 ( talk) 15:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now at best and restart if a better article is later available as this seems to have some coverage but perhaps not enough to solidly satisfy notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 08:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - I have added some content and extra sources to the article, but I am not sufficiently familiar with the guidelines in WP:COMPANY to be sure that the criteria are fulfilled. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep meet WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 07:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak keep. The notability seems mainly to be related to the takeover by PTT, but I thinkk that after work by user:Cwmhiraeth the articles satisfies WP:GNG. Beagel ( talk) 21:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - per the improvements by Cwmhiraeth. Ya sh ! 09:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 13:34, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Red Island Minerals
- Red Island Minerals ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable company. Created by SPA COI editor. Little content. Little independent coverage. Rayman60 ( talk) 15:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 22:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete for now at best and restart if a better article is later available as this seems to have some coverage but perhaps not enough to solidly satisfy notability guidelines. SwisterTwister talk 08:52, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - I have added some content and extra sources to the article, but I am not sufficiently familiar with the guidelines in WP:COMPANY to be sure that the criteria are fulfilled. Cwmhiraeth ( talk) 11:03, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep meet WP:ORG and WP:GNG. Wikic¤l¤gy t@lk to M£ 07:34, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Weak keep. The notability seems mainly to be related to the takeover by PTT, but I thinkk that after work by user:Cwmhiraeth the articles satisfies WP:GNG. Beagel ( talk) 21:41, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Keep - per the improvements by Cwmhiraeth. Ya sh ! 09:13, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.