- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Red Arrow International ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
advertising, editor is too close to the subject Fuddle ( talk) 19:37, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Advertisements masquerading as articles. Additionally, quite possibly created with a conflict of interest, but that is not a reason for deletion. -- ceradon ( talk • contribs) 01:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Something related to ProSiebenSat.1 Media sounds very notable for me, but the article as is without any references and long boring enumerations of unclear items should be deleted first for a fresh start from scratch. – Be..anyone ( talk) 09:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice to recreation if source material can be mustered for a restart. Leave a redirect to ProSiebenSat.1 Media and the edit history, if possible. Carrite ( talk) 17:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete-- Ymblanter ( talk) 07:53, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Red Arrow International ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
advertising, editor is too close to the subject Fuddle ( talk) 19:37, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:25, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Advertisements masquerading as articles. Additionally, quite possibly created with a conflict of interest, but that is not a reason for deletion. -- ceradon ( talk • contribs) 01:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 03:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle ( talk) 03:49, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
- Something related to ProSiebenSat.1 Media sounds very notable for me, but the article as is without any references and long boring enumerations of unclear items should be deleted first for a fresh start from scratch. – Be..anyone ( talk) 09:16, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete without prejudice to recreation if source material can be mustered for a restart. Leave a redirect to ProSiebenSat.1 Media and the edit history, if possible. Carrite ( talk) 17:28, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.