From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:RHaworth per CSD G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 14:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Recycling Computer Hardware

Recycling Computer Hardware (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Interview does not warrant a stand alone article. G S Palmer ( talk) 01:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion is more appropriate for this. I believe it falls under G1 "Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history" Spacegeek31 ( talk) 01:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:RHaworth per CSD G11 (unambiguous advertising or promotion). ( non-admin closure) • Gene93k ( talk) 14:47, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Recycling Computer Hardware

Recycling Computer Hardware (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Interview does not warrant a stand alone article. G S Palmer ( talk) 01:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply

Speedy deletion is more appropriate for this. I believe it falls under G1 "Pages consisting entirely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history" Spacegeek31 ( talk) 01:58, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:02, 22 May 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook