The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to
Mad Lion. czar 16:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment - As the
Allmusic source in the article mentions, this was a collaboration with
KRS-One - this may have helped it generate more coverage back in the day. Could help with source hunting.
Sergecross73msg me 20:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 18:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment. There are two questions here - firstly is it notable? Second, do we have enough content to justify an article? I think a good case could be made for notability. It topped both the Billboard heatseekers chart (
[1]) and the Top Reggae Albums chart (
[2]) as well as placing at no. 114 on the Billboard 200, and also appears in a CMJ chart (
[3]). This, however, can be summed up adequately in the article on the artist, so it then comes down to what other sources we can find. The Allmusic review is very brief, and other coverage that I found only mentions the album briefly (
[4],
[5],
[6]). Again, there's nothing here that cannot be covered adequately in the Mad Lion article, so unless more can be found I think a selective merge and redirect to
Mad Lion would be the best outcome. --
Michig (
talk) 07:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect as this seems best, the article is questionably notable by itself and is of course likely best known through Mad Lion's article.
SwisterTwistertalk 23:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to
Mad Lion. czar 16:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment - As the
Allmusic source in the article mentions, this was a collaboration with
KRS-One - this may have helped it generate more coverage back in the day. Could help with source hunting.
Sergecross73msg me 20:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kharkiv07 (
T) 18:30, 19 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment. There are two questions here - firstly is it notable? Second, do we have enough content to justify an article? I think a good case could be made for notability. It topped both the Billboard heatseekers chart (
[1]) and the Top Reggae Albums chart (
[2]) as well as placing at no. 114 on the Billboard 200, and also appears in a CMJ chart (
[3]). This, however, can be summed up adequately in the article on the artist, so it then comes down to what other sources we can find. The Allmusic review is very brief, and other coverage that I found only mentions the album briefly (
[4],
[5],
[6]). Again, there's nothing here that cannot be covered adequately in the Mad Lion article, so unless more can be found I think a selective merge and redirect to
Mad Lion would be the best outcome. --
Michig (
talk) 07:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Redirect as this seems best, the article is questionably notable by itself and is of course likely best known through Mad Lion's article.
SwisterTwistertalk 23:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 12:37, 26 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.